This is a minor issue that can be solved with a VC, but I would like to understand what I am doing wrong, or if this is simply not meant to work the way I expected.
I have a parent table (session), with related child entries (session_users). There is a lookup table (users) which contains properties for the child entries. Can be seen in this sample app https://www.appsheet.com//templates/?appGuidString=1503869e-e9fe-4c60-8067-ea908a1a3c34
The issue arises when I attempt to use [Related Session_Users] to reference values from the Users table, while looking at the Session (parent) table.
[Related Session_Users][ref_user_id]
Returns the correct key for the Users table, but trying to use that key in a SELECT, fails
SELECT(
Users[user_property],
[user_id]=
INDEX(
[Related Session_Users][ref_user_id]
,1)
)
It returns the correct value, but ALSO the last row of the Users table.
I can add VC's to the User_Sessions table to get all the columns from Users that I might want to display in Session, but I was trying to minimize VC use and it feels like I am making an error here somewhere.
It sounds you have the value 103 twice in your table.
It is not repeated.
I made this example app to demonstrate. I ran into this issue in a more complex app, when trying to reference child reference data in a form, and it produced much more confusing results, but fundamentally it appears what while I can return the correct key, I can't use them in a SELECT. IN(,) produces the same results.
SELECT(Users[user_property],IN([user_id],[Related Session_Users][ref_user_id]))
The issue manifests in a simple detail view as well.
Is this not supported? Am I missing something? Or do I simply use VC's to pull child-reference data, so that they can be referenced in the parent via [Related Child][VC of the child reference value I want to look up]
Other ref_user_id's will produce the same result (the correct row, as well as the last row).
What happens if you write SELECT(...,[user_id]="103")?
One value returned, and the correct one, as expected.
The issue manifests with [Related Rows]
What is the value that brings 6000?
The erroneous record is being pulled from from another row in Session_Users (sheets had reverted a deletion).
[Related Session_Users][ref_user_id]
Returns the correct key (and only one), but in the context of SELECT:
SELECT(Users[user_property],[user_id]=INDEX([Related Session_Users][ref_user_id],1))
[Related Session_Users][ref_user_id] is returning all (?) rows in Session_Users.
Is it just not supported to do this kind of lookup? Or am I doing something wrong syntactically? It's not obvious to me what to change to make this function, if it's possible.
User | Count |
---|---|
42 | |
33 | |
24 | |
23 | |
14 |