New Bug Encountered: In Workflow PDF DOC

[Aparicio_Pineyr]

Hi there,
I think there is a BUG regarding workflows Doc. Its supposed to send a PDF like a sheet with separate rows, but it seems that some how now is not separating the rows.
Please see the pictures, no DOC where change before this:

[Aleksi]

Would you please take a printscreen from your template.

[Aparicio_Pineyr]

[Phil]

Try adding a carriage return after the << Start >> expression.
That is just after the end of the entire << Start >> expression.
Add another carriage return just before the << End >> expression.

[Aparicio_Pineyr]

It separates the names from the table, but is not adding the black line between rows.

[Zecharya_Miche1]

I have the same issue. (Was working normally until a day or two ago.)

[Phil]

Please try removing the << End >> from the left most cell in the row and move it to the right most cell in the row.

That should repeat the entire row for each value in the << Start >> expression.

[Fabian_Weller]

Phil:

Please try removing the << End >> from the left most cell in the row and move it to the right most cell in the row.

This was the solution for me. The carriage return didn’t help.

@Phil Can you please explain, why this changed?

[Phil]

I recently enhanced how << Start >> and << If >> expressions can be used in table cells.
I am in the process of rolling out that change, which is why you saw the recent change in behavior.
I tried to greatly improve the power of << Start >> and << If >> expressions while retaining backward compatibility. It appears that my change affected your existing template. I am sorry about that.

Here are examples of what I am trying to allow you to achieve with enhanced << Start >> expressions.

These templates:

Produce these results:

Look at the last four templates and their corresponding results to see how the placement of the << End >> expression affects the outcome.

When the << End >> is in the rightmost table cell, the entire row is repeated for each value in the << Start >> expression.

When the << Start >> and << End >> are in the same cell, the values between the << Start >> and << End >> are repeated for each value in the << Start >> expression but are all listed in that cell.

I do not illustrate it, but you can even have one << Start >> and << End >> in one cell in the row and other << Start >> and << End >> expressions in other cells in that row.

I do not illustrate it in the examples, but << If >> expressions have also been enhanced.

1. You can use multiple << If >> expressions in each table cell.
2. An << If >> expression can control whether a value is displayed in a table cell or not.
3. An << If >> expression can control how a data value is formatted in the table cell. We preserve the formatting of the values inside the << If >> and matching << EndIf >> including the font color, size, bold, italic, etc.
4. << If >> expressions can be nested to arbitrary depths.

[Aparicio_Pineyr]

Thanks Phil!

[Zecharya_Miche1]

Fascinating. This explains why the below workflow is producing all the names in the same cell, whereas until now they were on separate lines. However, would I be correct to assume that in my example, the only solution is to create a nested table? (Note the separate Start expressions in each column.)